> because several features of dpkg more or less depend on it being > The reason why it is important for the entire system to be in dpkg is The answer to your question is "of course". I already described by example the arguments that extrainst takes, and Or at lease I would be, if I wasn't having to spend so much of my timeĪnd energy defending very simple optional modifications to programs on Number localization support without having to modify any existingįiles by using mobilesubstrate's centralized hook to insert theĪbility to more easily read carrier bundles from a set of directories. Providing a mechanism for safely loading carrier bundles and phone Providing debian like package organization to existing programs The solution is not sandboxing, the solution is mobilesubstrate That is for configuration and has semantics on when it can be runĭesigned around that, such as asking it to be reconfigured). It load your files (which you should /not/ be doing from postinst, as You might use extrainst to install a patch to another program to have Next message: Proposal: dictd for all?.Previous message: new dpkg control script: extrainst_.new dpkg control script: extrainst_ Jay Freeman (saurik) saurik at
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |